Topic: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

So if the US Gov. says that MMJ has no use, why the hell did they file a Patent on it? 


U.S. Patent # 6630507
In 2003, the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services filed for, and was awarded a patent on cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. U.S. Patent 6630507



Abstract
Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia. Nonpsychoactive cannabinoids, such as cannabidoil, are particularly advantageous to use because they avoid toxicity that is encountered with psychoactive cannabinoids at high doses useful in the method of the present invention. A particular disclosed class of cannabinoids useful as neuroprotective antioxidants is formula (I) wherein the R group is independently selected from the group consisting of H, CH.sub.3, and COCH.sub.3. ##STR1##

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

WOW!! Can we just print this out and post everywhere?? this seems like the law just sold itself out!! this makes me furious that the government is free to make things like this!!

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

You would think that setting legal precedents such as creating Marinol
to supposedly remove the need for Cannabis, and allowing its prescription,
sale and regulation would have been the 1st signpost along the way...
and maybe it still is.  The DEA followed up Marinol, with the sanctioning
of Stage III Clinical trials with G.W. Pharma's 'Sativex' for treating
MS, chronic pain and pain from cancer.  Add in the fact that the
GOVERNMENT applied for and received a PATENT on cannabinoids
for their anti-oxidant and neuroprotective properties (which I believe
was originally applied for 16 years ago).

So it's still categorized as one of the MOST DANGEROUS drugs in the CSA,
and the DEA and FDA maintain that regardless of their precedent setting actions
with these previous policies....  they still view it as one of the most dangerous
drugs on the planet.  Whatever you do, don't confuse the issue with facts,
and for that matter, let's not confuse legal policy with propaganda.

What's wrong with this picture?

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

Marinol is considered schedule 3 because amongst other claims like low abuse potential, it is synthetic THC made in a lab, and because it is sold as THC mixed in sesame oil in a soft gelatin capsule. Natural THC although identical to the synthetic THC is still prohibited, as is THC without sesame oil or the soft capsule. This was done by the USA government to make it hard to impossible to use herbal Cannabis as a medicine while allowing the same active ingredients, THC, to be made synthetically and sold. The USA government, National Cancer Institute, developed THC as a patent and then in 1985 sold the patent to Unimed and also assisted rescheduling in a hope to defuse the growing demand for marijuana as medicine. But an oral pill for nausea control is absurd, and patients soon discovered that Cannabis was in fact more useful for many patients if not most.
"On July 13, 1986, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Rule and Statement of Policy authorizing the "Rescheduling of Synthetic Dronabinol in Sesame Oil and Encapsulated in Soft Gelatin Capsules From Schedule I to Schedule II" (DEA 51 FR 17476-78). This permitted medical use of Marinol, albeit with the severe restrictions associated with Schedule II status. For instance, refills of Marinol prescriptions were not permitted. At its 1045th meeting, on April 29, 1991, the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, in accordance with article 2, paragraphs 5 and 6, of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, decided that ?9-tetrahydrocannabinol (also referred to as ?9-THC) and its stereochemical variants should be transferred from Schedule I to Schedule II of that Convention. This released Marinol from the restrictions imposed by Article 7 of the Convention.
In 1999, Marinol was rescheduled from Schedule II to III of the Controlled Substances Act, reflecting a finding that THC had a potential for abuse less than that of cocaine, and heroin. This rescheduling comprised part of the argument for a 2002 petition for removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, in which petitioner Jon Gettman noted, "Cannabis is a natural source of dronabinol (THC), the ingredient of Marinol, a Schedule III drug. There are no grounds to schedule cannabis in a more restrictive schedule than Marinol".
At its 33rd meeting, the World Health Organization Expert Committee on Drug Dependence recommended transferring THC to Schedule IV of the Convention, citing its medical uses and low abuse potential. This would put THC in the Convention's least stringently-controlled Schedule."

Although the DEA is in charge of the rescheduling of THC, the HHS, Secretary's findings on scientific and medical issues are binding on the DEA. The HHS Secretary can even unilaterally legalize cannabis: "If the Secretary recommends that a drug or other substance not be controlled, the Attorney General shall not control the drug or other substance."

Besides Marinol from Solvay, generic versions of THC were approved for sale in 2008 by Pars Pharmaceuticals and also another from Watson Pharmaceuticals, although the Watson Dronabinol generic is supplied by Solvay.

I predict that natural THC mixed in sesame oil and in a soft gelatin will be rescheduled in 2009 in the USA. But in truth the effects will be identical to Marinol, because THC, synthetic or natural is exactly the same.

Funny how the USA government in an effort to delay patients request for marijuana for medicine allowed Marinol to be rescheduled and sold, only to find it increased the demand for herbal Cannabis for medicine.
10 years later the voters in California passed 215 and the issue of herbal Cannabis for medicine Vs synthetic THC was again at the forefront. In the beginning the USA government said that a pill made Marinol safe because you did not need to smoke it, now Unimed is working on a Dronabinol inhaler, without smoke but used pretty much like a joint or really a vaporizor, although they use a nebulizer for delivery.
BTW in the USA propaganda is policy, unfortunately.
Several companies in Germany and the Netherlands have also started to produce and sell THC pharmaceutical products to patients including a pill that has the THC in a dry form.
To me the more delivery forms the more choices and much better for patients.

-Hempsci

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

Policy-propaganda-potato-potatoe (just for those who forgot about Dan Quayle)

Funny, I didn't even think to look what schedule Marinol was on...  now it's even funnier
(in a sick dark kind of way).  Will it eventually slide off the schedule altogether and become
an orphan drug? smile

The government is willing to sell you ridiculously priced medication that they developed
and gave to BigPharma, and all it does is get you HIGH?  Talk about missing the mark...
they were supposed to be working on something that eliminated the need for Weed...
so they left out all but 1 ingredient and expected it to work as well as something
that has 200+ ingredients. Hmmm.....

I wonder if UniMed will have trouble with the 'inhaler' that I've seen with the powdered
Insulin inhaler?

I'm with you...  the more transport mechanisms the better the chance it will work on
more patients.

I remember you saying someone in Europe was making CBD (10% dry), are they working
with other cannabinoids or terpenoids?

HempSci, just wanted to thank you for throwing solid info out there.

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

Yes pure CBD is legal in most of Europe. And in the Netherlands you can buy Cannabis with CBD from the pharmacies. The THC level is 6% and the CBD is 7.5% in Bediol®.
http://www.bedrocan.nl/Engels/indexeng.htm

-Hempsci

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

HempSci,

I missed their product breakdown when I checked out their site awhile back....
this stood out for me:

>> The quality

We hold ourselves to the highest possible standards of quality. During the entire growth process and the processing we dedicate ourselves to ensuring that the levels of functional components (THC, CBD) are constant and that no harmful micro organisms find their way in to our product. Every batch is individually sampled and checked for the presence of pesticides and heavy metals. They are also checked on whether or not they meet the required levels of essential components (THC, CBD). The tests are required by the government and done by an independent laboratory. <<

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

So why hasn't anyone challenged the scheduling of Cannabis based on the U.S. Patent # 6630507 ?

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

If the Pharma Corps continue to patent Cannabis cabanoids, is anyone wondering if this will lead to ultimate controll over this? Think about it. They hate competition. Also I was not aware that a natural substance could be controlled by a patent. Herbs cannot be patened. The process of production can be patented. Correct me if I am wrong here.

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

COMODeist wrote:

If the Pharma Corps continue to patent Cannabis cabanoids, is anyone wondering if this will lead to ultimate controll over this? Think about it. They hate competition. Also I was not aware that a natural substance could be controlled by a patent. Herbs cannot be patened. The process of production can be patented. Correct me if I am wrong here.

LOL... given the state of the U.S. Patent system (a travesty), is it any surprise that
our own government successfully patents things that they have BANNED?

Sativex is patented, it's a proprietary process and blend of THC, CBD and some terpenoids.
It's G&W's secret sauce smile  The fact that it is woefully low in potency doesn't seem to phase G&W.

Octotats, a very prudent question...  has anyone tried to challenge the schedule based on the U.S.
itself patenting the very item in question?  For that matter, why is MJ a Schedule I, and Marinol Schedule III?
What is the rationale?  If MJ is Schedule I, why did the FDA approve Stage III clinical trials for Sativex?

What is wrong with this picture???

Now let's see if the smart folks around here have some answers smile

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

You can patent a process or an *application* if it's a distinct or novel usage. The US HHS patents are for *novel uses* of cannabinoids, not the plant itself. That's how they got their talons on patents. It's the use of cannabinoids and not the cannabinoids themselves.

Currently, Sanofi-Adventis has 11 submitted patents on synthetic cannabinoid applications. Not including the failed Acomplia.

REMEMBER Acomplia / rimonabant? The weight loss drug that caused weight loss by DESTROYING your endocannabinoid system. Oh, yeah... you need a working one to live! Plus giving irreversable brain damage.  What fun! esp. when cannabis works and even leaves your brain intact. Thanks to Sanofi...

Q: "What is wrong with this picture???"
A: The corporate jets aren't as big as the yachts in it?  hmm

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

Living Green wrote:

You can patent a process or an *application* if it's a distinct or novel usage. The US HHS patents are for *novel uses* of cannabinoids, not the plant itself. That's how they got their talons on patents. It's the use of cannabinoids and not the cannabinoids themselves.

Currently, Sanofi-Adventis has 11 submitted patents on synthetic cannabinoid applications. Not including the failed Acomplia.

REMEMBER Acomplia / rimonabant? The weight loss drug that caused weight loss by DESTROYING your endocannabinoid system. Oh, yeah... you need a working one to live! Plus giving irreversable brain damage.  What fun! esp. when cannabis works and even leaves your brain intact. Thanks to Sanofi...

Q: "What is wrong with this picture???"
A: The corporate jets aren't as big as the yachts in it?  hmm

exactly! sad

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

Why the hell is the government filing patents in the first place, are they competing with a free market society. So actually the taxpayers are the owners of that patent.

Last edited by greenear (2009-06-06 17:13:06)

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

I Believe that this patent was applied for by a Doctor in California.He is the one who the patent belongs to.The job for the regular people now is to get this word out to everyone you can think of especially our goverment officals.I am pretty sure most people have no idea about all of this.This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

While I'm surprised at the number of people I meet that don't know this, it's not exactly a secret.

This patent was applied for and granted to the Dept of Health & Human Services arm of the federal government.

Universal Struggle wrote:

I Believe that this patent was applied for by a Doctor in California.He is the one who the patent belongs to.The job for the regular people now is to get this word out to everyone you can think of especially our goverment officals.I am pretty sure most people have no idea about all of this.This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

This would appear to be for synthetic THC pills. Marinol to be precise.

It would appear the effective equivalent is the plant....but, the pill only has 1 active ingredient....the same one that our federal laws are based on....THC. The other ingredients are irrelevant since it is only THC that violates the laws.

So a smart lawyer could easily argue the effective equivalent since one is schedule 3 based on scientific fact based  evidence the government has already proven... and patented it.

Do most lawyers really want this substance legal??? From my experiences with lawyers, they openly admit they don't want cannabis legal because it takes from their business....just like leo and the growers who profit from this plant for a living.

Remove the profit, and watch what happens to our plant rights.

Last edited by james sr (2010-05-19 18:47:08)

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

If you read the patent (which was approved), you'd see that it refers to Cannabinoids (plural), and that it is aimed at a much broader target than just Marinol (which was created far before the patent was applied for).

The CSA has cannabis as a Schedule I drug, along with Heroin.  It does NOT state THC.
Anything found in a psychoactive strain of cannabis is considered illegal (including CBD, CBG, terpenes, etc.)

Marinol actually has it's own place in the CSA, it is considered a Schedule III drug (go figure!).

james sr wrote:

This would appear to be for synthetic THC pills. Marinol to be precise.

It would appear the effective equivalent is the plant....but, the pill only has 1 active ingredient....the same one that our federal laws are based on....THC. The other ingredients are irrelevant since it is only THC that violates the laws.

So a smart lawyer could easily argue the effective equivalent since one is schedule 3 based on scientific fact based  evidence the government has already proven... and patented it.

Do most lawyers really want this substance legal??? From my experiences with lawyers, they openly admit they don't want cannabis legal because it takes from their business....just like leo and the growers who profit from this plant for a living.

Remove the profit, and watch what happens to our plant rights.

Re: U.S. Government files Patent # 6630507 cannabinoids

I missed the plural part.lol....