Archive for September, 2008

California Weekly Round Up 9-19-08

Friday, September 19th, 2008
Posted by Rebecca Saltzman

After Years of Waiting, Police Return Medicine to Huntington Beach Patient

After three years of waiting Jim Spray, a former client of ASA’s who had his medical cannabis wrongly confiscated by Huntington Beach Police, had his cannabis and growing equipment returned to him under court order earlier this week.  The order from Orange County Superior Court Judge Thomas Borris came nearly nine months after the 4th District Court of Appeal ruled in Garden Grove v. Superior Court that qualified patients who have their medication wrongly seized by police have the right to get it back..

Spray, who was represented by ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford in his case (in which the court reached the same ruling) is the second patient in Huntington Beach, to have had medication returned that was seized by police. According to officials, Huntington Beach Police don’t have a policy on dealing with medical cannabis.

To read a detailed account of Spray’s case, take a look at Joe Elford’s blog post about this story.

Santa Barbara Dispensaries Close Their Doors, After Feds Threaten Landlords

According to Dale Gieringer of California NORML, this week several Santa Barbara dispensaries closed their doors, in the face of threats by the federal government against their landlords. In early August, officials from the United States Justice Department had met with the landlords and admonished them to evict their dispensary tenants or risk asset forfeiture.

Hundreds of dispensary landlords throughout the state have received letters from the DEA advising them of their tenants’ activities and telling them that they risked asset forfeiture. However, neither the DEA nor the DOJ had ever followed up on these letters, except during these meetings in Santa Barbara.

Though this situation appears to be isolated, it is a huge loss for Santa Barbara patients and the surrounding communities. Since the only other central coast dispensary, run by Charles Lynch who was recently convicted in a federal court, was shut down last year, safe access in the area is now in danger. Patients will either be forced to drive long distances to procure their medicine or may have to resort to the illicit market.

For more information, please see Dale Gieringer’s full press release.

Area Medical Cannabis Dispensaries Urge Los Angeles City Council to Move Forward with Regulations

Representatives from a number of local medical cannabis dispensing collectives spoke before the Los Angeles City Council last Friday to ask that the council move quickly on adopting regulations and creating an ordinance governing medical cannabis dispensaries. Council members were attentive and interested in the concerns brought forth, a noticeable change from past meetings.

The meetings came partly in response to the recent dispensary guidelines issued by Attorney General Jerry Brown, in which Brown asserted that nonprofit dispensing collectives and cooperatives are legal under California law.  The medical cannabis community requested that the council provide them with guidelines and regulations in order to engage in best practices and to better serve the community.  To date, Los Angeles has issued no such regulations.

Patient James Spray Gets His Marijuana Back from the Police and the Concentrated Cannabis Is Still Usable

Thursday, September 18th, 2008
Posted by Joe Elford

In November of 2003, medical marijuana patients James Spray has his medical marijuana seized after members of the Huntington Beach Police came to his home in response to an “erroneous 911 call.” The officers seized approximately five ounces of marijuana, twelve immature plants, and jar of concentrated cannabis and marijuana cultivation equipment.

Spray, then, filed a motion in the Superior Court, but the motion was denied, with the judge claiming that there was no authority for this under California law. What made the case most interesting to me was that it occurred in Orange County. This was the hotbed for return of medical marijuana cases because that’s where the only published case occurred. In Chavez v. Superior Court, the court held that Marvin Chavez was not entitled to the return of his more than ten pounds of medical marijuana because he admitted that it was not all for his personal medical use. Courts and prosecutors throughout the state relied on this case for the proposition that no medical marijuana patient can have his marijuana returned even when legally possessed under California law. The Chavez case did not say this, and we had been fighting this in a number of cases; however, because one can only appeal the denial of a motion for return of property through a procedure known as a writ, the appellate courts could elect to ignore us altogether, which is what they did.

By the end of the day, I had filed a half dozen writs, and trust me, they are burdensome. But the most promising one involved Felix Kha, who was granted his motion for return of property and the City, for a change, had to file the writ after we threatened it with contempt for refusing to return his marijuana. that was in October of 2005. The case, then, just sat there for months and there was nothing we could do to get it going — until Jim Spray’s case came along. With the filing of the writ in his case, I could remind the court of appeal that the Garden Grove case was pending and that this was an issue that needed to be resolved. I had become frustrated and James Spray’s case was a vehicle to push the issue along. It did.

Soon after we filed the writ in Jim Spray’s case, the Garden Grove case got moving again. Eventually, both cases were consolidated for oral argument and, in bizarre fashion, I argued consecutively — first, as the Real Party in Interest on one side of the court in Garden Grove; then, moving my briefcase three feet over, as the Petitioner in Spray. All of the Justices cracked a smile on this one. That’s some lawyer humor for you.

Three months later, decisions were entered in favor of our side in both cases, as you probably all know by know. Garden Grove v. Superior Court (Kha). was published. Spray was not, but both resulted in orders for the return of medicine. Still, the difficulties continued.

For reasons still unknown to me, the Superior Court refused to issue a written order for the return of Spray’s property, despite being directed by the court of appeal to do so. This required a lot of persistence on Jim’s part, as well as some work by mine. Finally, after I sent the court a letter with the order and the opinion attached the trial court signed the order.

Jim was delighted when I gave him the news and, two days ago, he took the order to the Huntington Beach Police Department to get his medicine and equipment back. Although much of the cultivation equipment had been mysteriously destroyed and the dried marijuana and marijuana plants were unusable, one jar contained several grams of concentrated cannabis that Jim may still use. I never thought I’d see the day.

California Weekly Round Up 9-12-08

Saturday, September 13th, 2008
Posted by George Pappas

1. Fresno County Approves Patient ID Cards

This week, after months of persistent pressure from the Fresno ASA chapter, the Fresno County Supervisors finally approved the state mandated medical cannabis ID card program, becoming the 41st county in California to do so. Fresno County citizens who use cannabis for medical reasons will now be able to get a county-issued ID card to show police in law enforcement encounter.

Fresno supervisors had been opposed and dismissive of the program, stalling and postponing the issue on the county agenda for months.   However, the Fresno ASA chapter and MPP’s Aaron Smith never let up on county officials, attending every meeting and demanding to be heard.  Tragically, it took the passing of a dedicated and passionate ASA member, Dawn Nolan, for the county to realize that their stalling may literally have cost patients their lives.

In addition to Fresno, Tulare, Merced, and Kern counties in the San Joaquin Valley also issued cards to medical-cannabis users this year. Because of the hard work of Dawn and others, one of the strongest opposed counties has implemented the program, creating a model for any other holdouts.

The identification card mandate was passed by the state legislature in 2003to protect patients from being arrested and to make cannabis-related encounters easier on law enforcement, though some counties have refused to implement the program.  San Diego and San Bernardino counties lost twice in state court, aggressively refusing  to provide patients with simple ID cards so they won’t mistakenly be arrested.  Despite the losses, boards of supervisors of both counties recently voted to appeal to the CA Supreme Court. Hopefully, the action of Fresno supervisors will influence other hold-out counties.


2. Alameda County Supervisors Reject Edible Ban For some time, the Sheriff of Alameda County has been waging an attempt to impose stringent regulations on dispensaries, the most recent being a proposed ban on the sale of cannabis based edibles.  Although edibles are legal under California law as well as under recent guidelines released by the Attorney General, and are critical treatment for patients who are unable to inhale cannabis or for whom ingesting is more effective treatment, the sheriff has nonetheless been a convincing voice to County Supervisors.  The attempted ban that would be effective for all of unincorporated Alameda County, has been ongoing for months, and hearings have led to confusing testimony from the Sheriff.  Those present noted that the Sheriff was inexplicably aggressive and insulting to county supervisors, while the reasons for his virulent opposition to edible medication for seriously ill California patients remain unclear.  Supervisors were to meet on Monday to vote on the edible ban.

In response to the Sheriff, ASA filed a letter to Alameda Supervisors explaining the value of edibles to patients and suggesting the possibility of litigation if Alameda banned edible sales by dispensaries.  ASA also referenced the recently issued Attorney General guidelines to be sure officials were up-to-date with the status of California law.  As a result, the Board of Supervisors tabled the vote until at least the end of October, to give them time to review and educate themselves on the law, and for the time being, edible sales will continue.

Michael Martin’s Journey through the Federal Justice System

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008
Posted by Guest

This guest post is written by Michael Martin, a medical cannabis edible provider who was raided by the DEA and recently sentenced in federal court. You can find out more about Martin’s saga and contribute to his defense fund at www.freetainted.com.

Imagine waking up one morning to realize that you are locked in a battle with justice, morality, and the United States government.  Talk about a scary realization. When we set out on this battle to fight for our freedoms, in all honesty we felt pretty doomed, but vowed to not give up our beliefs in medical cannabis and our confidence in the community. Our organization understood from the beginning that we were making more than food products.  We always felt that we were changing the world, one candy bar at a time.

For Tainted Compassion, being actively involved in the community was imperative. We saw it as our duty and honor to serve patient needs where others would not, and defend the honor of the medical marijuana movement at all costs.  You might say we began preparing for this experience throughout the years, as we built our company with patient safety and community awareness being the cornerstones of our efforts. We strived to be more than just confectioners. Our efforts were driven by our beliefs in cannabis therapies and the need for social change. Instilling these beliefs in everyone involved with the company was a daily task, and we worked tirelessly to provide the cleanest and safest medications in the marketplace, in which patients could be confident of quality and effectiveness.  Our daily operations kept us focused on being a part of a larger community, and from the beginning of our battle for justice our business practices made a difference in the way we were perceived, treated, and prosecuted by the government. My best advice to people in the movement is to not wait until something happens to begin preparing for it. Look around and see what could be done better now and make improvements where needed.

I can remember getting home from court the day I surrendered to authorities, looking around my ransacked house and just taking in the magnitude of what I was up against.  I looked at the broken doors, the cracked safe, the piles of paperwork scattered about and understood clearly that this was a war I was entrenched in with an armed and well-funded militant group that used failed policies and flawed logic to invade my home and businesses. Overwhelming is an understatement. I was outraged by the senseless actions of the government and I was worried for my family. My wife assured me that she had confidence in me and supported my efforts to create awareness for the cause through our family’s toughest moments. My wife understood I was not just some pothead who had taken things too far, but a medical patient and a person who had strong convictions about the rights of people to use cannabis as a medicine. Having this support at home allowed me to focus more clearly on the task at hand, and gave me confidence to carry on in the face of danger. I would strongly encourage for people to surround themselves with people who understand their beliefs and support their actions.

The next hurdle to overcome was to begin changing public perception surrounding our case. We counted on the staff at ASA to work with the media and other outlets to change the climate of the dialogue surrounding our case. They worked tirelessly to help make people understand that we did not just make “pot candy” that was a danger to children, but that we made edible forms of cannabis medicines that were only distributed to qualified patients in California.  I remember spending weeks on end combatting false perception on different websites and blogs that had slandered our intentions and bought in to the DEA’s ruthless interpretation of our case.  It can drive one crazy, as the internet allows for anyone anywhere to publish anything, and often this form of media is dangerously inaccurate. I can recall having to simply stop wasting my energy fighting with people who had no idea of who I was and did not understand our situation. It had become maddening.

A week after I had turned myself in I was honored to be invited to speak with ASA in Los Angeles at a rally in front of the governor’s office. I remember speaking to the crowd of some 300 medical cannabis activists and was energized by the experience. It was a much needed outlet for my frustrations, and a rallying cry for the movement to get moving. That night the Arts District healing Center was raided and I was on the front lines protesting the DEA’s actions. I remember being very angry, as I saw firsthand the injustices our community faced, as armed gunmen forcibly removed property from the building. We stood in solidarity that night and vowed to continue fighting these injustices.

A week later I found myself face to face with the same agents that had raided my house, as a dispensary in Hayward was in the progress of being raided.  I pleaded with the agents to think about their actions. I screamed for them to stop the senseless invasions on our community and focus their efforts on finding real criminals. I begged them to research the efficacies of medical cannabis and listen to science and medical professionals. They were not listening.  They laughed at me. I understood clearly that there was no reasoning with them.

I organized a protest at the Oakland Federal Building, to be followed by a bake sale. I showed up in a Santa suit carrying a large uncle Sam head that I had painted that simply stated “LIAR.” Several activists joined me, as we sang Christmas carols and protested the violent raids in our community. I spent the better part of a day making a large Christmas card for the DEA, which some thirty activists signed and we delivered to the security staff at the federal building. My wife clearly thought I was insane, but I felt compelled to make some sort of a stand to combat the injustices of the situation. It was a moral victory, if nothing else.

But it may have served as a practical victory, as well.  The prosecutor acknowledged his awareness of the protests and offered us a very generous plea bargain, considering that he could have fought to have me incarcerated for a decade. I had come to a fork in the road. The decision was clear. I could put my future in the hands of a jury that would have no background on the medicinal intentions of our products, or I could accept the government’s offer and make my plea to the sentencing judge to have leniency when considering the unique circumstances of our case. After a lot of soul searching and discussions with my family and friends, I reluctantly accepted the lesser of two evils, and spared my family and many others involved with our organization the grueling process of a grand jury indictment and full blown investigation into every corner of my life.  It saddened me to have to admit guilt when I believed I was doing the right thing, but I could not gamble with my family’s future and risk spending ten plus years behind bars on principle alone.

At this point we were faced with a new set of challenges. We shifted our focus to making the probation office, the judge, and the prosecution aware of the difficulties facing the medical cannabis community and the reasoning that had lead us to become providers of medical cannabis.  We began reaching out for support from patients, activists, and people close to us in hopes that through the words of many the voice of reason would prevail. We began a letter writing campaign that we hoped would help others to understand that we did not stand alone in our beliefs of cannabis therapeutics. We gathered these letters through community events, partnerships with several medical cannabis organizations and their outlets, and through an online forum for submitting letters of support. We ended up with about a hundred statements of support addressed to the judge, ranging from very personal encounters from those who know and love us, to abstract letters that affirmed the support of our cause. The culmination of these efforts were invaluable, as the judge at sentencing acknowledged her awareness of our support through the many letters she had received. It took a lot of persistent work to gather and submit these many different statements, but I truly believe that it was this community support that made a real difference in the eventual outcome of us not being incarcerated for our efforts. I cannot thank everyone enough who took time out of their lives to help us out.

I began writing about my experiences early on in the process at freetainted.com, as I found it a good release for my energy and it helped me to create understanding for our cause. I remember wondering if anyone besides my mother ever read my work, as I would occasionally post it to activist lists and forums throughout the community. Every once in a while someone would respond in support, but I did not think that there were many people listening. I was wrong. I began receiving calls and letters of support and inquiries from publications about using my writings. People became interested and involved, as I allowed them to be a part of the process by sharing my deepest thoughts and most intimate feelings about my future. This is not always easy, as you worry how much is too much information and you often can feel as if you are whining too much about your situation.  You wonder if people really care and worry about burdening others with your personal plight. I continued to press on with my writing though, as it simply made me feel better.

What began as a simple outlet for my frustrations and thoughts about our case, also became one of the most valuable resources in our fight for justice. Our blog was not only read by active members of the medical cannabis community, but also read by attorneys and officers of the court. It provided a much deeper background into our views and beliefs and created understanding in places that often cannot see clearly the views of the medical cannabis movement. It created a dialogue of knowledge that people who were interested could access and make more informed decisions about who we were and what we stood for. I was told by many that came out to support us that they had followed my writings and were motivated to advocate on our behalf. It was inspiring. I was honored that my ramblings had served a purpose and that people felt like they knew me before they had ever met me. I was astonished by the truly caring nature of these folks that had been following along in cyberspace, and it was touching to see people who were glad to stand by us in our most trying moment.

On our day of sentencing we were surrounded by supporters from far and wide.  People had travelled from long distances, taken time off work, and were passionate about helping us find a more just path.  I recall turning around before our press conference and seeing fifty plus people holding signs in support of medical cannabis. True activism was taking place on this otherwise regular Wednesday afternoon and I knew at that moment that our months of hard work and efforts had paid off. I knew that no matter what happened in that courtroom that we had accomplished bringing together a large constituency of supporters to be witness to history. Friends I had not seen in a decade came from out of town to stand by my side and to comfort my family. People continually thanked me for my efforts and I was surrounded by a wonderful group of community activists that vowed to keep fighting for the rights of patients and providers.

It was an anxious afternoon, as I stood amidst the wooden backdrop of the federal courtroom patiently awaiting the decision that would affect my life for years to come. I had mentally prepared to deal with the ramifications of being incarcerated and I was ready for the worst. I was amazed when the Judge began inquiring into the rationale of the legal parameters concerning medical cannabis, as this was unlike any of the experiences I had witnessed or read about in other cases involving medical marijuana. It seemed as if somewhere along the lines the judge had understood that there was a difference between cannabis and medical cannabis and that she felt it was worth exploring further. My attorneys did a fine job of trying to explain in detail the ever changing climate in the battle between state rights and federal justice. I recall thinking that our movement had come a long way, as a federal judge was now interested in learning more about more than whether or not a law was simply broken, but also why that law had been broken. There was a recognition of our community’s beliefs and it was comforting to feel somewhat validated by the experience.

At the end of the day I was still a convicted felon.  I was still sentenced to two years of confinement, split between home confinement and a halfway house, and will be monitored for five years. I had still lost everything in the process of it all, but I still felt as if I had won a small victory by avoiding a long period of incarceration and loss of time with my family.  When you begin a process feeling as if you are doomed and will be imprisoned for many years of your life, it is invigorating when you are spared a long trip to prison in favor of a lesser alternative.  Of course I regret that we had to overcome these odds and that we are still branded as criminals, but I am grateful for the compassion that was shown in not taking us away from our loved ones.  I regret that my co-workers were thrust into these positions, as they did not deserve to lose their liberties over medical cannabis foods. They performed wonderfully in the face of aggression and I was proud to have had such a great and well-informed staff. They will forever hold a special place in my heart and can stand proud as valuable examples of courage and valor we should all expect from those we work with in this movement for change.

The many different components that worked in our favor to help secure a more just outcome renews my faith in community support and involvement. I cannot express enough the gratitude I had when the entire courtroom stood in solidarity behind me. It proved firsthand that a small group of dedicated citizens working together CAN create real change and continue to chip away at the obstacles that stand in the way of safe access.

If you have not done so already, reach out to the many others facing imprisonment and show support for the movement by writing letters on their behalf. Take time to go to court, reach out and talk to public officials, and by all means vote. Often times our movement does not move very rapidly, but we continue to see progress. We will continue to see progress, as we get more people involved with direct action and roles of support.  I encourage everyone to do your part and when you are done with that find a friend and teach them how to do their part. Through persistence, we will continue to knock down barriers and eventually safe access WILL be a reality in our society.

Tell Governor Schwarzenegger to Sign AB 2279!

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008
Posted by Don Duncan

A bill sponsored by Americans for Safe Access (ASA) to protect medical cannabis patients from workplace discrimination will soon arrive on the desk of California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Whether the Governor signs Assemblymember Mark Leno’s (D-SF) AB 2279 or vetoes this important legislation depends, in large part, on what he hears from medical cannabis supporters like you in the next few days.

You may have already seen an email or flyer from ASA asking you to call the Governor. Have you done it yet? Now is the time… call Governor Schwarzenegger today!

You will not be alone when you speak up in support of AB 2279. The bill is endorsed by Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), who represent over one million California workers. The National Lawyers Guild and numerous health care advocacy organizations are also on board.

ASA sponsored AB 2279 and worked hard to get it passed in both houses of the California legislature in response to a California Supreme Court decision in February that upheld the termination of a legal medical cannabis patient, based solely on the fact that he used medical cannabis! We have had dozens of reports of employment discrimination and hundreds of calls from worried employees since then. We need the Governor’s signature to be sure that legal patients can stay in the workforce and be productive members of society.

ASA Members and allies have mobilized a tremendous grassroots campaign to get AB 2279 this far. We need everyone to pitch in one more time right now to let the Governor know how his constituents feel about this bill. Please take a moment right now to ask Governor Schwarzenegger to sign AB 2279.

ASA staff has met with Governor Schwarzenegger’s staff on three occasions since last October to talk about his role in protecting medical cannabis patients in California, including AB 2279. This is his first chance to take concrete action by signing the bill.

There is no time to lose. The Governor will beginning signing and vetoing bills as soon as the current budget impasse is resolved. He is already hearing from lobbyists representing law enforcement and employers, who oppose AB 2279. Now, he needs to hear from patients and medical cannabis advocates en masse. Please act again today to protect patients’ rights!

CA Weekly Round Up 9-5-08

Monday, September 8th, 2008
Posted by George Pappas

1. Tainted, Inc’s Michael Martin & Jessica Sanders Sentenced; Federal Judge Shows Compassion

Directly after the 2007 DEA raid on the Bay Area based Tainted, Inc, which provided cannabis-based food products to patients, owner Michael “Mickey” Martin faced a potential 10 years in federal prison.   But in Tuesday’s sentencing hearing at the Federal Courthouse in Oakland, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilkin showed not only compassion for Mr. Martin in handing down a sentence of 1 year in a half-way house, 1 year home confinement, and 5 years probation, but also acknowledgment and consideration of California’s medical cannabis laws.  Jessica Sanders, an employee of Tainted was also sentenced along with Mickey, and received 1 year home confinement and 3 years probation.

In the press conference preceding the sentencing hearing, a large congregation of Mr. Martin’s supporters gathered outside the steps of the courthouse to demonstrate against the injustice of federal courts sentencing legal medical cannabis patients and providers.  ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford spoke to media about what this case meant in the broader frame of the state-federal conflict over medical cannabis, saying, “The legislative branch failed Mickey, the executive branch failed him, and now the judicial branch has an opportunity to show compassion.”  Inside the courtroom, statement’s by Mr. Martin’s attorneys were filled with emphatic pleas for leniency and dramatic cries of hypocrisy by the federal government. Mickey himself gave an emotional, heart-wrenching statement that seemed to affect all those present.

The courtroom, packed with Mickey’s supporters, at one point all stood up in a moving show of solidarity that clearly impacted the court. Judge Wilken’s questions about Tainted’s compliance with California’s medical cannabis laws, and whether there were any indications or evidence of Mickey ever having given cannabis to children or to those who were not legally qualified patients, of which there were none, were surprising to many in attendance.  But when the judge asked Mr. Martin’s probation officer to clarify whether or not she was legally mandated to hand down prison time at all, a cautious sense of hope rippled through the courtroom.

The Judge went on to talk about the confusion between state and federal laws cannabis laws in a way that was reminiscent of, and probably just as significant, as the Rosenthal trial, when Ed Rosenthal was sentenced to one day in federal prison for growing hundreds of medical cannabis plants. Noting his volunteer work and activism in the community, as well as the numerous court support letters she had received prior to the hearing, it seemed clear to the federal judge that imprisoning Mickey would not benefit society. ASA and others put much effort into building court support for Mickey, hoping the the federal judge would show compassion and understanding in this case brought maliciously before her by DEA.  Thanks to everyone who called, sent letters, showed up at the hearing, or otherwise gave support to Mickey throughout this difficult time. This sentence was a tribute to the huge impact that court support can have.


2. Los Angeles City Council Extends Medical Cannabis Dispensary Moratorium

The Los Angeles City Council this week approved a six-month extension of the city’s moratorium on new medical cannabis dispensaries, a move designed to provide time for city officials seeking to draft new regulations covering the cannabis facilities.  The move by the city council comes as cities and counties throughout California are incorporating the recently released Attorney General guidelines on medical cannabis, which direct law enforcement to follow state, not federal law, and which affirm the legality of collectives, cooperatives, and dispensaries that operate in non-profit fashion.

Many local policy makers are using the guidelines as an indicator of the permanence and refinement of California’s medical cannabis law.  In the twelve years since Proposition 215 in 1996, the legality of the initiative has been questioned by law enforcement and some fringe counties.  However, multiple rulings in state and federal courts that affirm the validity of the law, laws passed by the state legislature, and now the recent guidelines put forth by the top law enforcement officer in California are spurring localities to enact dispensary regulations in the interest of patients. The council voted 14-0 to continue the temporary moratorium,  initially enacted in August 2007.

Councilman Dennis Zine said the moratorium would give the city attorney’s office time to recommend a medical cannabis dispensary policy that would prevent abuses while still ensuring that such facilities are available to legitimate medical patients.

A great day for the Martin family and the medical cannabis movement

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008
Posted by Rebecca Saltzman

Michael Martin speaking at the press conference before his sentencing hearing.

I woke up this morning feeling nervous and unsettled. My friend and colleague Michael Martin was to be sentenced this afternoon, and I prepared myself for the worst. But after an emotional rally and lengthy sentencing hearing, I felt at ease because Mickey is not going to prison.

After pleading guilty in federal court to manufacturing marijuana edibles, with the government finding more than 400 plants, Mickey faced a guidelines range of 30 to 37 months imprisonment.  However, due to the tension between state and federal law and the lack of any evidence that any edible produced by Mickey was diverted to recreational use, United States District Court Judge Claudia Wilkin exercised her discretion to sentence Mickey to 5 years probation, with one year to be served in a halfway house and one year to be served in home confinement.

The hearing was intense. Judge Wilkin asked several astute questions about state law and the interplay between state law and federal law. Clearly, she saw that the conflicting laws made medical marijuana cases unique. After Mickey’s attorneys spoke about state law and the need for a change in federal law, Mickey spoke for himself. He talked about the cancer patients that had been able to eat after using his edibles. He spoke about his loving family and his service to the community. He explained that he had only done what he did to help people, and never to profit. Half way into his speech, most of the dozens of supporters packing the court room were in tears.

His speech and the stack of support letter the judge had received made a difference. And after the judge announced his sentence, the entire court room of supporters stood up and clapped.

Of course, Mickey never should have been prosecuted in the first place and deserves no punishment for providing medical cannabis edibles to ailing California patients. But this punishment was the best he could have hoped for. It means that he will not miss any years of his children’s lives and that he can continue to work and provide for his family.

This sends another message by a federal judge that the federal government should not waste its time bring these cases.