Unanimous Landmark Appellate Decision Issued in San Diego Medical Marijuana Dispensary Case
Fourth District Court of Appeal rejects requirement that all collective members must be actively involved in cultivationSan Diego, CA -- The Fourth District Court of Appeal for
California issued a unanimous published ruling today in a landmark
medical marijuana case that reverses the conviction of a San Diego
dispensary operator, Jovan Jackson, convicted in September 2010
after being denied a defense in state court. Today's landmark ruling
also reversed the lower court's finding that Jackson was not
entitled to a defense, providing the elements for such a defense in
future jury trials.
"This landmark decision not only recognizes the right of
dispensaries to exist and provide medical marijuana to their patient
members, it also grants a defense for those providers in state
court," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe
Access (ASA), the country's leading medical marijuana advocacy
group. Elford also argued Jackson's appeal before the court. "By
rejecting the Attorney General's argument that patients who utilize
dispensaries must collaborate, or 'come together' in 'some way' to
cultivate the marijuana they purchase, the court is establishing a
clear standard for dispensaries across the state."
Specifically, today's ruling held that in mounting a defense at
trial, "Jackson was only required to produce evidence which would
create a reasonable doubt as to whether the defense provided by the
[Medical Marijuana Program Act] had been established." The court
further held that, "the collective or cooperative association
required by the act need not include active participation by all
members in the cultivation process but may be limited to financial
support by way of marijuana purchases from the organization. Thus,
contrary to the trial court's ruling, the large membership of
Jackson's collective, very few of whom participated in the actual
cultivation process, did not, as a matter of law, prevent Jackson
from presenting an MMPA defense."
ASA appealed Jackson's conviction in late 2011 and argued the case
just two weeks ago. The case against Jackson became a symbol of the
effort by San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis and other
prosecutors across the state to criminalize storefront medical
marijuana collectives. However, today's published decision deals a
significant blow to that effort. It's unclear whether the Attorney
General will appeal today's ruling to the California Supreme Court,
but the case may get remanded back to the lower court for proper
jury instructions if the district attorney chooses to retry Jackson.
Jackson operated his storefront collective without incident until he
was raided by law enforcement in 2008. Jackson was tried for
marijuana possession and sales in 2009, but was acquitted by a jury.
Dissatisfied with that result, District Attorney Dumanis tried
Jackson again on the same charges stemming from a September 2009 law
enforcement raid. It was at his second trial that Jackson was denied
a defense and ultimately convicted. San Diego Superior Court Judge
Howard Shore, who referred to medical marijuana as "dope," and
called California's medical marijuana laws "a scam," had sentenced
Jackson to 180 days in jail.
Further information:
Today's landmark appellate court ruling: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Jackson_Appeal_Ruling.pdf
Jackson appeal brief filed by ASA: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Jackson_Appeal.pdf
Attorney General reply brief: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Jackson_Appeal_AG_Reply.pdf
ASA reply brief: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Jackson_Appeal_Reply.pdf