For Immediate Release: August 29th, 2012
Medical Marijuana Advocates File Signatures for Referendum to Overturn Los Angeles Dispensary Ban
If referendum qualifies, city council will be forced to either rescind its ordinance or call a special election
Los Angeles, CA -- With plenty of time to spare,
medical marijuana advocates filed more than 50,000 signatures today
in an effort to overturn a recently passed ban on dispensaries
throughout the city. Despite a loud outcry from patient advocates,
the Los Angeles City Council adopted an outright ban last month on
medical marijuana distribution within the city limits. The ban came
after the city failed over a more than 4-year period to develop
regulations suitable for providing medical marijuana to the tens of
thousands of area patients.
What: Coalition press conference on filing
referendum signatures to overturn Los Angeles dispensary ban
When: Wednesday, August 29th at 12 Noon
Where: Room Terrace D at the Sheraton Universal Hotel, 333
Universal Hollywood Drive, Universal City, CA 91608
"Very soon, the city will be faced with having to rescind its
ordinance or putting the decision before Los Angeles voters," said
Don Duncan, California Director with Americans for Safe Access, the
country's largest medical marijuana advocacy group. "Because of the
ban's questionable future, the city ought to reconsider its tough
stance on enforcing the ban." The council recently voted to
collaborate with federal agents and to fund an unprecedented
enforcement effort aimed at shutting down hundreds of legally
compliant facilities in the city.
After the dispensary ban was passed by the Los Angeles City Council
on July 24th, a group calling itself the Committee to Protect
Patients and Neighborhoods with the help of PCI Consulting began
gathering signatures to overturn it. The city now has up to 30 days
to either rescind the ban or call a special election and put the
decision to Los Angeles voters early next year. Depending on timing,
the city may be forced to hold a separate election in addition to
the March primary and May mayoral election.
Prior to the July vote to ban dispensaries, ASA helped generate more
than ten thousands letters urging the council to adopt sensible
regulations rather than a complete ban. The city had weakly
attempted to develop regulations over the past few years, but the
resulting ordinance was so flawed that it was challenged by dozens
of lawsuits. Notably, more than 50 municipalities in California have
adopted dispensary regulations, which in almost all cases bring a
significant economic benefit and lower rates of crime in surrounding
neighborhoods.
Today's filing also came a week after the California Supreme Court
dismissed as moot
Pack v. City of Long Beach, the decision
on which the Los Angeles ban was predicated. "Given the recent
dismissal of the
Pack decision by the California Supreme
Court, the ban has absolutely no basis," continued Duncan. "The city
should be figuring out ways to work with patients instead of
shutting the door on them without any viable reason other than sheer
contempt."
On the same day the city council adopted the ban on dispensaries, it
also voted to task the city attorney with drafting an ordinance to
regulate a certain number of facilities. Patient advocates have
consistently supported sensible regulatory proposals similar to one
recommended by Council member Paul Koretz and Council President Herb
Wesson, which would begin to address the needs of thousands of
qualified patients in the city.
Further information:
Referendum to overturn LA dispensary ban:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/LA_Referendum_1.pdf
# # #